FYI, this is something people were discussing at ROSCon and will
probably be covered as part of the nextgen ROS SIG:
http://www.ros.org/wiki/groovy/Planning/RosNG
Damon
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Jack O'Quin <
jack.oquin@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Karan, Cem F CIV (US)
> <cem.f.karan.civ@mail.mil> wrote:
>> I'd definitely support this; I've been wanting to experiment with SCTP
>> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stream_Control_Transmission_Protocol) as a
>> transport layer, but had no idea how to get it working with ROS. Having
>> some well-supported interface in ROS to tie in new transports would make
>> that MUCH easier!
>
> +1
>
> There is clearly widespread interest in a more modular transport
> layer. I suspect the tricky part will be clarifying implicit client
> assumptions about bandwidth, reliability, quality of service, etc.
> --
> joq
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
> ros-users@code.ros.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
--
----------------------------------------------
Damon Kohler
Software Engineer
Google Germany GmbH
Dienerstr. 12
80331 München
----------------------------------------------
AG Hamburg, HRB 86891
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Katherine Stephens
----------------------------------------------
Diese E-Mail ist vertraulich. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat
sind, leiten Sie diese bitte nicht weiter, informieren den Absender
und löschen Sie die E-Mail und alle Anhänge. Vielen Dank.
This email is confidential. If you are not the right addressee please
do not forward it, please inform the sender, and please erase this
e-mail including any attachments. Thanks.
(text/plain)