Re: [ros-users] cartesian trajectories

Top Page
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
+ (text/html)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: User discussions
To: User discussions
Subject: Re: [ros-users] cartesian trajectories

The ROS-I group is very interested in this. We would support an REP effort.

Are you aware if anybody is currently using a cartesian trajectory (this definition or any other)?

From: [] on behalf of Jonathan Bohren []
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 6:45 PM
To: User discussions;
Subject: [ros-users] cartesian trajectories

A long time back there was an API review for cartesian trajectory messages [1] but it'd be nice to standardize a ROS interface for cartesian manipulator goals and trajectories.

Is anyone interested in resuming this, maybe as an REP and ratifying it (or whatever we want to call the creation of message standards)?


Jonathan Bohren
Laboratory for Computational Sensing and Robotics