Re: [ros-users] Software Status Reporting and Custom Builds

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Tully Foote <tfoote@osrfoundation.org>wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Jack O'Quin <jack.oquin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Vincent Rabaud <vincent.rabaud@gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> I guess this whole conversation deserves a proper SIG no ? There seem to
>>> be a lot of interest and several things to talk about: standards, policies,
>>> reports, software. Actually, just came across an ABI / API breakage site
>>> for popular open source projects :
>>> http://upstream-traing I'll go to thcker.org/<http://upstream-tracker.org/>
>>> Some of the ones we use in our ecosystem are there:
>>> http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/assimp.html
>>> http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/opencv.html
>>> http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/pcl.html
>>> http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/yaml-cpp.html
>>>
>>
>> Either that, or take it to the already-existing build system SIG:
>>
>> http://wiki.ros.org/groovy/Planning/Buildsystem
>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/ros-sig-buildsystem
>>
>
> The buildsystem sig is probably a good place to take this. This will need
> to be integrated with the buildsystem and it has already come up in
> discussions there.
>

+1. This thread has been going for long enough to prove its interest.

Adolfo.


>
> Tully
>
>
>> --
>> joq
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ros-users mailing list
>> ros-users@code.ros.org
>> http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
> ros-users@code.ros.org
> http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>
>