+1 from myself also
On Feb 15, 2014, at 1:56 AM, Georg Bartels <
georg.bartels@cs.uni-bremen.de> wrote:
> +1 from me for the following paragraph from Ben:
>
>
>> What I love about ROS is that it has so far been focused on the software experience rather than the hardware. It almost seems like a contradiction to be worrying about QoS when much of your code is Python scripts and other higher-level languages (instead of C) running on Ubuntu (instead of a RTOS). I'm certainly not saying that QoS is unimportant -- it would be very nice to have -- but I would place simplicity as a higher priority. Maybe ROS Industrial would be a better place for DDS or baked-in QoS?
>>
>> -Ben
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: ros-users-bounces@lists.ros.org [ros-users-bounces@lists.ros.org] On Behalf Of Brian Gerkey [gerkey@osrfoundation.org]
>> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 3:56 AM
>> To: User discussions
>> Subject: [ros-users] ROS & DDS
>>
_______________________________________________
ros-users mailing list
ros-users@lists.ros.org
http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
(text/plain)