+1 for a warning; I've definitely gotten bitten by this issue when
controlling a robot over wifi.
Ben
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:20 AM, Paul Mathieu
<
paul.mathieu@pal-robotics.com>wrote:
> Right now, it appears that the default setting is easily broken for a
>> minority of use cases and non-intuitive to debug. And that would be good to
>> amend. Better to have it working everywhere and optimisable for power use
>> cases.
>>
>> Adding some notes on the wiki probably won't do much to notify existing
>> users - typically copy/pasting from nearby code what I do.
>>
>> So back to my earlier question - is setting a queue size expensive in the
>> python implementation? If there isn't a technical weakness there, then I'm
>> all for a) warnings and a migration point sometime in the future - it
>> wouldn't be very costly to mechanically search and destroy all
>> rospy.Publisher instances in a ros workspace.
>>
>
> I agree with Daniel. Changing the default will break existing code, but if
> the default is undesirable in a non-negligible amount of cases, then it
> should be changed.
> I would be in favor for a warning in Indigo, and a change of behavior in
> J-turtle.
>
> Paul
>
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
> ros-users@lists.ros.org
> http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
ros-users mailing list
ros-users@lists.ros.org
http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
(text/plain)