On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:20 AM, Paul Mathieu
<
paul.mathieu@pal-robotics.com>wrote:
>
>> So back to my earlier question - is setting a queue size expensive in the
>> python implementation? If there isn't a technical weakness there, then I'm
>> all for a) warnings and a migration point sometime in the future - it
>> wouldn't be very costly to mechanically search and destroy all
>> rospy.Publisher instances in a ros workspace.
>>
>
> I agree with Daniel. Changing the default will break existing code, but if
> the default is undesirable in a non-negligible amount of cases, then it
> should be changed.
> I would be in favor for a warning in Indigo, and a change of behavior in
> J-turtle.
>
+1 for agreement with Daniel and Paul.
For a long time I made an intuitive assumption that rospy worked similarly
to roscpp. Having used rospy more lately, I now realize that was wrong.
But, I still think similar behavior is desirable.
--
joq
_______________________________________________
ros-users mailing list
ros-users@lists.ros.org
http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
(text/plain)