On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Mike Purvis <
mpurvis@clearpathrobotics.com>
wrote:
> Might be another argument for someone to try building up a unofficial farm
> of Precise/Indigo debs. Do we have a sense how many of the 1000 or so
> released Indigo packages have an *actual* problem with the CMake/Boost
> versions which ship with Precise?
>
> How ugly of a hack would it be to use the Saucy bloom branches to build
> Precise debs? How much time would it take to find out?
>
There is no way to do this that I know of, you would need to re-bloom all
packages for precise. This is because the rosdep key -> ubuntu key will
have changed for several of the keys. For example: PCL, OpenCV,
urdfdom_headers, urdfdom, sdformat, gazebo, boost, ogre, just to name the
ones off the top of my head. My guess is that the effort involved is
considerable.
Another strategy would be to use a chroot method for trusty. This was used
back when most people were still on precise but wanted to test indigo
stuff. I'm not sure travis would allow this or condone this though. I'm
just not sure.
>
> On 8 September 2014 17:46, William Woodall <william@osrfoundation.org>
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Dave Coleman <davetcoleman@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not sure if this is the best mailing list for this question, but has anyone
>>> found a work around to use Travis CI with ROS Indigo? Travis only runs
>>> Ubuntu Precise, confirmed by
>>> https://github.com/travis-ci/travis-ci/issues/2046
>>>
>>
>> Nope, I just use hydro for now. There really isn't a good option if you
>> want to use travis until travis supports Trusty. You could build what you
>> need from source, but that probably would take too long.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> So it lacks the ROS debians to build, for example, MoveIt's Indigo
>>> branch. Its frustrating to have all pull requests for Indigo fail i.e.
>>> https://github.com/ros-planning/moveit_ros/pull/490
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> dave coleman
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 6:00 AM, <ros-release-request@code.ros.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Send ros-release mailing list submissions to
>>>> ros-release@code.ros.org
>>>>
>>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>>> http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release
>>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>>> ros-release-request@code.ros.org
>>>>
>>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>>> ros-release-owner@code.ros.org
>>>>
>>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>>> than "Re: Contents of ros-release digest..."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Today's Topics:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Re: dropping unmaintained Ubuntu distributions ? (Tully Foote)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Message: 1
>>>> Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2014 13:58:45 -0700
>>>> From: Tully Foote <tfoote@osrfoundation.org>
>>>> To: The ROS release mailing list <ros-release@code.ros.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: [ros-release] dropping unmaintained Ubuntu distributions
>>>> ?
>>>> Message-ID:
>>>> <CAM7qi7U9NcH6-drP82rPTU=Rp8C=
>>>> jbwcLMe4u7Yy5EsCyx9-pA@mail.gmail.com>
>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>>>
>>>> Yes, we do plan to spin down the builds of EOL'd Ubuntu platforms. we
>>>> have
>>>> not done this yet as we do not have that level of configuration built
>>>> into
>>>> the buildfarm. So we'll need to do some development to support that.
>>>>
>>>> With respect to libgphoto2 this isn't an EOL issue. It appears that in
>>>> Saucy only libgphoto2-6-dev was released to replace libgphoto2-2-dev but
>>>> the decision was reverted in trusty. So to fix this we just need to
>>>> update
>>>> the rosdep rule.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Link online:
>>>>
>>>> http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=libgphoto2-6-dev&searchon=names
>>>>
>>>> >From saucy/amd64 Packages file:
>>>> Package: libgphoto2-6-dev
>>>> Priority: optional
>>>> Section: libdevel
>>>> Installed-Size: 11550
>>>> Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com>
>>>> Original-Maintainer: Debian PhotoTools Maintainers <
>>>> pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
>>>> Architecture: amd64
>>>> Source: libgphoto2
>>>> Version: 2.5.2-0ubuntu5
>>>> Replaces: libgphoto2-2-dev
>>>> Depends: libgphoto2-6 (= 2.5.2-0ubuntu5), libexif-dev, libusb-1.0-0-dev,
>>>> libc-dev, pkg-config
>>>> Conflicts: libgphoto2-2-dev
>>>> Filename:
>>>> pool/main/libg/libgphoto2/libgphoto2-6-dev_2.5.2-0ubuntu5_amd64.deb
>>>> Size: 3340498
>>>> MD5sum: d57c9dc5d1d22c38edeec64902755179
>>>> SHA1: 6f1ad45da2c535f799268e13f9b7f81fcc6b151f
>>>> SHA256: 9974beae6a435a5678e24d8e02abfefe36097e8db9c009920ee5cd783f68f019
>>>> Description: gphoto2 digital camera library (development files)
>>>> Homepage: http://www.gphoto.org/proj/libgphoto2/
>>>> Description-md5: 09f6d0ae3f118a398b90fb84845618e0
>>>> Bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug
>>>> Origin: Ubuntu
>>>> Supported: 9m
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Tully
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Vincent Rabaud <
>>>> vincent.rabaud@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Hi all,
>>>> >
>>>> > just a thought: we've had problems with Quantal and Oneiric builds in
>>>> the
>>>> > past. And I see the same thing now on Saucy (
>>>> >
>>>> http://jenkins.ros.org/view/IbinS32/job/ros-indigo-rospilot_binarydeb_saucy_i386/
>>>> > simply because for some reason,
>>>> > http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/libgphoto2-2-dev was not released in
>>>> > Saucy).
>>>> > Indigo is also an LTS for 5 years and I doubt we'll keep maintaining
>>>> 10
>>>> > Ubuntu distributions.
>>>> >
>>>> > Wouldn't completing REP003 with dropping an Ubuntu distribution once
>>>> it's
>>>> > out of life a good thing ? Do we have stats on package downloads to
>>>> back
>>>> > that up ? Docs for what to drop here:
>>>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
>>>> > That would also obviously make bloom and builds faster (or cheaper).
>>>> >
>>>> > Thoughts ?
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > ros-release mailing list
>>>> > ros-release@code.ros.org
>>>> > http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>>> URL: <
>>>> http://lists.ros.org/pipermail/ros-release/attachments/20140907/953fc4be/attachment-0001.html
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> ros-release mailing list
>>>> ros-release@code.ros.org
>>>> http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> End of ros-release Digest, Vol 35, Issue 3
>>>> ******************************************
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ros-release mailing list
>>> ros-release@code.ros.org
>>> http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> William Woodall
>> ROS Development Team
>> william@osrfoundation.org
>> http://wjwwood.io/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ros-release mailing list
>> ros-release@code.ros.org
>> http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ros-release mailing list
> ros-release@code.ros.org
> http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release
>
>
--
William Woodall
ROS Development Team
william@osrfoundation.org
http://wjwwood.io/
_______________________________________________
ros-release mailing list
ros-release@code.ros.org
http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release
(text/plain)