what do you think about unifying the BoundingBox2D.msg
<
https://github.com/Kukanani/vision_msgs_proposal/blob/master/msg/BoundingBox2D.msg>
and BoundingBox3D.msg
<
https://github.com/Kukanani/vision_msgs_proposal/blob/master/msg/BoundingBox3D.msg>
messages?
we could have the three fields (or vector) to the bounding box size and, in
the case it is a 2d bounding box, the Z field would be zero. I think we
would gain in simplicity, in a similar way we have a pose message
(geometry_msgs/Pose) that is generic and serves both 2d and 3d poses,
according to what is set in Z.
---
[Visit Topic](
https://discourse.ros.org/t/proposal-new-computer-vision-message-standards/1819/23) or reply to this email to respond.
If you do not want to receive messages from ros-users please use the unsubscribe link below. If you use the one above, you will stop all of ros-users from receiving updates.
______________________________________________________________________________
ros-users mailing list
ros-users@lists.ros.org
http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
Unsubscribe: <
http://lists.ros.org/mailman//options/ros-users>
(text/plain)