I didn't say it was a good solution, just a workaround for now. I'm not aware of any systems that will behave badly when `/tf_static` is periodic, off-hand. Since most migrated from tf1, where there was no `/tf_static`, it should be ok for now.
Long term we obviously need to improve the bridge so that latching is supported.
---
[Visit Topic](
https://discourse.ros.org/t/ros1-bridge-failed-to-pass-tf-static-message-when-subscribed-from-rviz/3863/4) or reply to this email to respond.
If you do not want to receive messages from ros-users please use the unsubscribe link below. If you use the one above, you will stop all of ros-users from receiving updates.
______________________________________________________________________________
ros-users mailing list
ros-users@lists.ros.org
http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
Unsubscribe: <
http://lists.ros.org/mailman//options/ros-users>
(text/plain)