ROS Quality Assurance Working Group meeting minutes April 2018 Meeting
Time: 3 p.m. UTC
**Notes:**
**_Agenda:_**
We still working on the first initiative, Making ROS Packages quality visible. We identified a [list of Quality Metrics](
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Ujwc2rjmywWpiamCGNRAdD3USNurXLqunIvgSrSbwvM/edit#gid=0) to use (display for each package). We defined most of these metrics in a google doc. Currently, the list contains over 20 metrics. We need to prioritize which metrics to implement first. During this meeting, will went through these metrics and assign an implementation priority (i.e. High, Medium and Low).
**_Outcome:_**
During the meeting participants voted a priority for each metric. Please refer to the [Quality Metrics](
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Ujwc2rjmywWpiamCGNRAdD3USNurXLqunIvgSrSbwvM/edit#gid=0) for the vote results. The list of metrics and the voted priority listed below:
1. CI Badge
1. Build High
1. Unit Tests High
1. Unit Test Coverage [%] High
1. Static Analysis
1. Code style violations Medium
1. Logic errors and warnings Medium
1. Cyclomatic complexity Low
1. McCabe complexity Low
1. Afferent coupling Medium
1. Efferent coupling Medium
1. Dynamic Analysis
1. Clang AddressSanitizer and LeakSanitizer High
1. Testing
1. Fuzzy testing by chaos node Low/Medium
1. Documentation
1. Comment to code ratio Low
1. Documentation coverage Medium
1. Package/Library Status (lifecycle) High
1. Existence of a roadmap Medium
1. Existence of readme Low/Medium
1. Wiki page quality/completeness Medium
1. Tutorial availability Medium
1. Open issues report
1. Number of closed issues Low
1. Time to close issue Low/Medium
1. Activity on issues Medium
1. Other status (eg: wont-fix, etc.) Low
1. Number of open issues Low
1. User Rating Medium/High
1. Other
1. Maintainability Index Low/Medium
1. Depth of Inheritance Low
1. Class Coupling High/Medium
1. Lines of Code Low
1. Cyclic includes Medium/Low
We will be moving to implement this initiative and we seeking help. We calling for volunteers to assist in the implementation of this initiative, Making ROS packages quality visible. Please, get in touch if you like to help?
---
[Visit Topic](
https://discourse.ros.org/t/ros-quality-assurance-working-group-meeting-minutes-april-2018-meeting/4473/1) or reply to this email to respond.
If you do not want to receive messages from ros-users please use the unsubscribe link below. If you use the one above, you will stop all of ros-users from receiving updates.
______________________________________________________________________________
ros-users mailing list
ros-users@lists.ros.org
http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
Unsubscribe: <
http://lists.ros.org/mailman//options/ros-users>
(text/plain)