I do not have experience with ROS 2, but your points regarding integration testing sound valid.
> Do above tests make sense?
Yes, at least for the major part. I have been working on random testing and property-based testing myself, at the node/integration level, although for ROS 1.
I had this idea of expanding mutation testing in ROS, in which the ROS primitives could be mutated themselves in a meaningful way (i.e. redirecting topics, messing with queue sizes, changing callback functions to a simple *skip* or *abort*), although I am not sure how useful that would be in practice.
> Is it possible to pack them all into one single framework?
Is there any advantage to packing all these different kinds of tests into a single framework? It could prove hard to do so in a way that is intuitive for the user.
---
[Visit Topic](
https://discourse.ros.org/t/integration-testing-in-ros-2/6859/2) or reply to this email to respond.
If you do not want to receive messages from ros-users please use the unsubscribe link below. If you use the one above, you will stop all of ros-users from receiving updates.
______________________________________________________________________________
ros-users mailing list
ros-users@lists.ros.org
http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
Unsubscribe: <
http://lists.ros.org/mailman//options/ros-users>
(text/plain)