[quote="gbiggs, post:4, topic:7930"]
Yep, that makes sense. What Im wondering is does this have any impact on the analysis of threads that are annotated? If an annotated thread interacts with a non-annotated one, how trustworthy are the analysis results?
[/quote]
Good question - the way I understand it the annotations are more about data than the threads themselves - so if you annotate data as being guarded, the analysis will spit out warnings for other code/packages only if it is built with `-Wthread-safety`, and accesses that data unsafely (according to the the analysis rules). So we could keep "non-ported" code warning-free by not enabling that flag on it until it's been looked at specifically.
---
[Visit Topic](
https://discourse.ros.org/t/adding-clang-thread-safety-analysis-for-ros2-core-packages/7930/6) or reply to this email to respond.
If you do not want to receive messages from ros-users please use the unsubscribe link below. If you use the one above, you will stop all of ros-users from receiving updates.
______________________________________________________________________________
ros-users mailing list
ros-users@lists.ros.org
http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
Unsubscribe: <
http://lists.ros.org/mailman//options/ros-users>
(text/plain)