[quote="esteve, post:6, topic:8139"]
All the core packages must have the same MAJOR.MINOR version to indicate that they are only compatible within each other, but PATCH releases can evolve independently.
[/quote]
Assuming that with "core packages" you refer to the packages in the three repositories starting with "core_" I think the concept of versioning according to semver collides with the proposal to use the same MAJOR.MINOR.
If there is a breaking change in e.g. `core_perception` you would level its major version following semver. Why should that also result in requiring to level all the other core packages? Users of these APIs shouldn't be broken. So imo requiring MAJOR.MINOR to be the same eliminates the advantage of versioning the repositories individually.
---
[Visit Topic](
https://discourse.ros.org/t/splitting-the-autoware-ai-repository-and-changing-the-organisation/8139/22) or reply to this email to respond.
If you do not want to receive messages from ros-users please use the unsubscribe link below. If you use the one above, you will stop all of ros-users from receiving updates.
______________________________________________________________________________
ros-users mailing list
ros-users@lists.ros.org
http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
Unsubscribe: <
http://lists.ros.org/mailman//options/ros-users>
(text/plain)