[ros-release] Travis CI for Indigo

Mike Purvis mpurvis at clearpathrobotics.com
Mon Sep 8 22:45:00 UTC 2014


Might be another argument for someone to try building up a unofficial farm
of Precise/Indigo debs. Do we have a sense how many of the 1000 or so
released Indigo packages have an *actual* problem with the CMake/Boost
versions which ship with Precise?

How ugly of a hack would it be to use the Saucy bloom branches to build
Precise debs? How much time would it take to find out?

On 8 September 2014 17:46, William Woodall <william at osrfoundation.org>
wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Dave Coleman <davetcoleman at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure if this is the best mailing list for this question, but has anyone
>> found a work around to use Travis CI with ROS Indigo? Travis only runs
>> Ubuntu Precise, confirmed by
>> https://github.com/travis-ci/travis-ci/issues/2046
>>
>
> Nope, I just use hydro for now. There really isn't a good option if you
> want to use travis until travis supports Trusty. You could build what you
> need from source, but that probably would take too long.
>
>
>>
>> So it lacks the ROS debians to build, for example, MoveIt's Indigo
>> branch. Its frustrating to have all pull requests for Indigo fail i.e.
>> https://github.com/ros-planning/moveit_ros/pull/490
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> dave coleman
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 6:00 AM, <ros-release-request at code.ros.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Send ros-release mailing list submissions to
>>>         ros-release at code.ros.org
>>>
>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>>         http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release
>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>>         ros-release-request at code.ros.org
>>>
>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>>         ros-release-owner at code.ros.org
>>>
>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>> than "Re: Contents of ros-release digest..."
>>>
>>>
>>> Today's Topics:
>>>
>>>    1. Re: dropping unmaintained Ubuntu distributions ? (Tully Foote)
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 1
>>> Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2014 13:58:45 -0700
>>> From: Tully Foote <tfoote at osrfoundation.org>
>>> To: The ROS release mailing list <ros-release at code.ros.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [ros-release] dropping unmaintained Ubuntu distributions
>>>         ?
>>> Message-ID:
>>>         <CAM7qi7U9NcH6-drP82rPTU=Rp8C=
>>> jbwcLMe4u7Yy5EsCyx9-pA at mail.gmail.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>>
>>> Yes, we do plan to spin down the builds of EOL'd Ubuntu platforms. we
>>> have
>>> not done this yet as we do not have that level of configuration built
>>> into
>>> the buildfarm. So we'll need to do some development to support that.
>>>
>>> With respect to libgphoto2 this isn't an EOL issue. It appears that in
>>> Saucy only libgphoto2-6-dev was released to replace libgphoto2-2-dev but
>>> the decision was reverted in trusty. So to fix this we just need to
>>> update
>>> the rosdep rule.
>>>
>>>
>>> Link online:
>>>
>>> http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=libgphoto2-6-dev&searchon=names
>>>
>>> >From saucy/amd64 Packages file:
>>> Package: libgphoto2-6-dev
>>> Priority: optional
>>> Section: libdevel
>>> Installed-Size: 11550
>>> Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-devel-discuss at lists.ubuntu.com>
>>> Original-Maintainer: Debian PhotoTools Maintainers <
>>> pkg-phototools-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org>
>>> Architecture: amd64
>>> Source: libgphoto2
>>> Version: 2.5.2-0ubuntu5
>>> Replaces: libgphoto2-2-dev
>>> Depends: libgphoto2-6 (= 2.5.2-0ubuntu5), libexif-dev, libusb-1.0-0-dev,
>>> libc-dev, pkg-config
>>> Conflicts: libgphoto2-2-dev
>>> Filename:
>>> pool/main/libg/libgphoto2/libgphoto2-6-dev_2.5.2-0ubuntu5_amd64.deb
>>> Size: 3340498
>>> MD5sum: d57c9dc5d1d22c38edeec64902755179
>>> SHA1: 6f1ad45da2c535f799268e13f9b7f81fcc6b151f
>>> SHA256: 9974beae6a435a5678e24d8e02abfefe36097e8db9c009920ee5cd783f68f019
>>> Description: gphoto2 digital camera library (development files)
>>> Homepage: http://www.gphoto.org/proj/libgphoto2/
>>> Description-md5: 09f6d0ae3f118a398b90fb84845618e0
>>> Bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug
>>> Origin: Ubuntu
>>> Supported: 9m
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Tully
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Vincent Rabaud <vincent.rabaud at gmail.com
>>> >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi all,
>>> >
>>> > just a thought: we've had problems with Quantal and Oneiric builds in
>>> the
>>> > past. And I see the same thing now on Saucy (
>>> >
>>> http://jenkins.ros.org/view/IbinS32/job/ros-indigo-rospilot_binarydeb_saucy_i386/
>>> > simply because for some reason,
>>> > http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/libgphoto2-2-dev was not released in
>>> > Saucy).
>>> > Indigo is also an LTS for 5 years and I doubt we'll keep maintaining 10
>>> > Ubuntu distributions.
>>> >
>>> > Wouldn't completing REP003 with dropping an Ubuntu distribution once
>>> it's
>>> > out of life a good thing ? Do we have stats on package downloads to
>>> back
>>> > that up ? Docs for what to drop here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
>>> > That would also obviously make bloom and builds faster (or cheaper).
>>> >
>>> > Thoughts ?
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > ros-release mailing list
>>> > ros-release at code.ros.org
>>> > http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release
>>> >
>>> >
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL: <
>>> http://lists.ros.org/pipermail/ros-release/attachments/20140907/953fc4be/attachment-0001.html
>>> >
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ros-release mailing list
>>> ros-release at code.ros.org
>>> http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release
>>>
>>>
>>> End of ros-release Digest, Vol 35, Issue 3
>>> ******************************************
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ros-release mailing list
>> ros-release at code.ros.org
>> http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> William Woodall
> ROS Development Team
> william at osrfoundation.org
> http://wjwwood.io/
>
> _______________________________________________
> ros-release mailing list
> ros-release at code.ros.org
> http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-release
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ros.org/pipermail/ros-release/attachments/20140908/a7b52515/attachment.html>


More information about the ros-release mailing list