[ros-users] Content of deb packages.

[Konrad Banachowicz]

That sounds good.
I think that kind of packaging should be used for next release.
Keeping the old scheme packages will make migration to new one more
difficult, because potentially more and more packages can be build in bug
"faulty way".

Pozdrawiam
Konrad Banachowicz


2010/11/1 Jeremy Leibs <leibs at willowgarage.com>

> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Adam Leeper <aleeper at stanford.edu> wrote:
> > I disagree on removing sources... they are useful for reference (if you
> > can't get online) even if you aren't doing development on a package.
>
> Once we have a valid concept of an install target within the ros build
> system, I intend to automatically generate 3 debs per stack:
>  - ros-<distroname>-<stackname>   will contain the minimal "installed"
> version of the stack.  Executables, libs, and exported headers only.
>  - ros-<distroname>-<stackname>-src  will additionally contain the
> rest of the source code for the stack.
>  - ros-<distroname>-<stackname>-tests  will contain the compiled
> unit-tests for the stack.
>
> >
> >
> > Adam Leeper
> > Stanford University
> > aleeper at stanford.edu
> > 719.358.3804
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Konrad Banachowicz <konradb3 at gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I would go further and say that sources should be removed from debs.
> >> debs are not intended to be build by hand. If i want to do some devel on
> >> package, I will checkout code form svn.
> >> Pozdrawiam
> >> Konrad Banachowicz
> >>
> >>
> >> 2010/10/31 Konrad Banachowicz <konradb3 at gmail.com>
> >>>
> >>> But depending on a file which should not exist is not a bug ?
> >>> Pozdrawiam
> >>> Konrad Banachowicz
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2010/10/31 Jack O'Quin <jack.oquin at gmail.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Konrad Banachowicz <
> konradb3 at gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>> > From my point of view this will not introduce new bugs,but this
> could
> >>>> > reveal
> >>>> > existings ones.
> >>>>
> >>>> If something worked before, then starts failing because a file it
> >>>> depended on was purged from the package, that seems like a "new bug"
> >>>> to me.
> >>>> --
> >>>>  joq
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> ros-users mailing list
> >>>> ros-users at code.ros.org
> >>>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> ros-users mailing list
> >> ros-users at code.ros.org
> >> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ros-users mailing list
> > ros-users at code.ros.org
> > https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
> ros-users at code.ros.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ros.org/pipermail/ros-users/attachments/20101101/39955bc3/attachment-0003.html>