[ros-users] Content of deb packages.

Konrad Banachowicz konradb3 at gmail.com
Sun Oct 31 18:06:12 UTC 2010

>From my point of view this will not introduce new bugs,but this could reveal
existings ones.

Konrad Banachowicz

2010/10/31 Jeremy Leibs <leibs at willowgarage.com>

> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 5:32 AM, Konrad Banachowicz <konradb3 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I have some concerns about content of ROS deb packages.
> > Every deb contains build dir, which is actually more than half of size of
> > package.
> > I some packeges use more than 1.5GB of disk space.
> > As far as i know content of build dirrectory is useless because it
> contain
> > paths used to build deb.
> Yes, we have been aware of this fact for a while and trying to remedy
> the situation.  Unfortunately some of the ROS packages were previously
> linking against some of the libraries only stored in the build
> directory, and so removing them broke things.  We opted to leave them
> in since the only impact was on filesize.  The build system is now
> purging them in the "unstable" line of debs, so they should definitely
> be gone from "diamondback" when it comes out.  I don't know if we are
> planning to make a comparable change for cturtle since we don't want
> to introduce new bugs into our stable line of debs in the event that
> we don't catch a corner case.
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
> ros-users at code.ros.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ros.org/pipermail/ros-users/attachments/20101031/9220f041/attachment-0003.html>

More information about the ros-users mailing list