[ros-users] Software Status Reporting and Custom Builds
Jack O'Quin
jack.oquin at gmail.com
Fri Sep 6 16:51:38 UTC 2013
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Edwards, Shaun M. <sedwards at swri.org> wrote:
> Looks like the discussion has died down. I agree with Adolfo's changes
> and will incorporate them. Unfortunately, I didn't hear an overwhelming
> response that the entire ROS community would find the status reporting
> useful. I had hoped to incorporate the status symbols into the broader ROS
> wiki, instead of the "Industrial" sub pages. For now I will leave the
> status descriptions where they are and mark the ROS-Industrial specific
> packages appropriately. Maybe over time we will see if others choose to
> use them.
>
+1
I don't have much to add to what many have already posted, but I think the
need for better package status is pretty widespread.
--
joq
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ros.org/pipermail/ros-users/attachments/20130906/6acea2ae/attachment.html>
More information about the ros-users
mailing list