[ros-users] [Discourse.ros.org] [Computer Vision / Perception] Proposal - New Computer Vision Message Standards

Procópio Stein ros.discourse at gmail.com
Mon May 22 11:50:01 UTC 2017



what do you think about unifying the BoundingBox2D.msg
<https://github.com/Kukanani/vision_msgs_proposal/blob/master/msg/BoundingBox2D.msg>
 and BoundingBox3D.msg
<https://github.com/Kukanani/vision_msgs_proposal/blob/master/msg/BoundingBox3D.msg>
 messages?
we could have the three fields (or vector) to the bounding box size and, in
the case it is a 2d bounding box, the Z field would be zero. I think we
would gain in simplicity, in a similar way we have a pose message
(geometry_msgs/Pose) that is generic and serves both 2d and 3d poses,
according to what is set in Z.





---
[Visit Topic](https://discourse.ros.org/t/proposal-new-computer-vision-message-standards/1819/23) or reply to this email to respond.




More information about the ros-users mailing list