Re: [ros-users] ROS package git repository conventions?

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: User discussions
Date:  
To: User discussions
Subject: Re: [ros-users] ROS package git repository conventions?
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Ibrahim Awwal
<> wrote:
> Hi ROS users,
>
> We're considering/planning on switching to git/github for the Berkeley
> ROS package. What are the conventions on structure and such that people
> are using? With svn we have a url like this
> http://ros.berkeley.edu/svn/berkeley-ros-pkg/ with all our stuff, with
> git would it be preferrable to have one repo called berkeley-ros-pkg or
> separate repos for each stack and maybe link them together with
> submodules? What are other people doing that are using git? It seems
> like at least TUM is using separate repos per project on their git repo
> (which seems to be the much more sane route) but I was wondering if
> there was any requirement to have something called foo-ros-pkg
> somewhere. Thanks,


There is a Q&A on ROS answers about git:

http://answers.ros.org/question/1278/can-a-single-git-repository-release-multiple-ros

Briefly, the answer was "one stack per git repo".

I don't know about any requirement for a foo-ros-pkg repo.
--
 joq