On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Edwards, Shaun M. <
sedwards@swri.org> wrote:
> Looks like the discussion has died down. I agree with Adolfo's changes
> and will incorporate them. Unfortunately, I didn't hear an overwhelming
> response that the entire ROS community would find the status reporting
> useful. I had hoped to incorporate the status symbols into the broader ROS
> wiki, instead of the "Industrial" sub pages. For now I will leave the
> status descriptions where they are and mark the ROS-Industrial specific
> packages appropriately. Maybe over time we will see if others choose to
> use them.
>
+1
I don't have much to add to what many have already posted, but I think the
need for better package status is pretty widespread.
--
joq
(text/plain)