On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Vincent Rabaud <
vincent.rabaud@gmail.com>wrote:
> I guess this whole conversation deserves a proper SIG no ? There seem to
> be a lot of interest and several things to talk about: standards, policies,
> reports, software. Actually, just came across an ABI / API breakage site
> for popular open source projects :
> http://upstream-tracker.org/
> Some of the ones we use in our ecosystem are there:
> http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/assimp.html
> http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/opencv.html
> http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/pcl.html
> http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/yaml-cpp.html
>
Either that, or take it to the already-existing build system SIG:
http://wiki.ros.org/groovy/Planning/Buildsystem
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/ros-sig-buildsystem
--
joq
(text/plain)