[quote="bmagyar, post:3, topic:6155"]
Id prefer ROS releases transitioning towards ROS2 which of course assumes stable apis/concepts on that end. ROS2 IMHO is potentially facing the challenge of ha fling fragmented communities along the lines of OS-s.
[/quote]
There has been a lot of discussion about this in the past, and the sort-of consensus was (or at least the decision by OSRF) that from a development and maintenance perspective *and* a fear of breaking ROS1 for ppl currently using it, the only option was a clean slate (see also the end of [Why ROS 2.0?](
http://design.ros2.org/articles/why_ros2.html)).
[quote="bmagyar, post:3, topic:6155"]
which of course assumes stable apis/concepts
[/quote]
Perhaps at a high level we could seek conceptual re-use / transitioning and [a shim](
https://discourse.ros.org/t/ros1-shim-library-development-proposal/5873) could help, but not sure whether what you're suggesting is practical (personally I'd like it too though).
---
[Visit Topic](
https://discourse.ros.org/t/discussion-on-ros-to-ros2-transition-plan/6155/4) or reply to this email to respond.
If you do not want to receive messages from ros-users please use the unsubscribe link below. If you use the one above, you will stop all of ros-users from receiving updates.
______________________________________________________________________________
ros-users mailing list
ros-users@lists.ros.org
http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
Unsubscribe: <
http://lists.ros.org/mailman//options/ros-users>
(text/plain)