Besides the technical and logistical issues here, I don't understand how there are so many commentators that appear to have inside knowledge of how OR runs their business, where they get their funding or what their evil plans are for ROS 1 and/or ROS 2.
Am I happy with how things are going: no, perhaps not with everything.
Do I start posting accusatory comments on a thread that started with the question "how can we make sure ~~the~~ *a* transition to ROS 2 can be done in an efficient and as painless manner as possible?": no, I don't.
Do I get out the bucket of vitriol, take a large gulp and fire up Discourse? Neither.
Could things have been perhaps more clearly communicated by the various stake-holders and people involved: yes, surely. And that would have avoided quite a bit of frustration.
Unfortunately the situation is as it is right now, so can we *please be constructive* and make the best of it?
And @TheDash: "no one here has any examples" -> you conclude this after 1 day?
---
Edit: just to clarify: I'm not defending anyone here. I'm simply amazed by the level of the comments that pass by here in this thread and felt a need to respond to that.
---
[Visit Topic](
https://discourse.ros.org/t/discussion-on-ros-to-ros2-transition-plan/6155/51) or reply to this email to respond.
If you do not want to receive messages from ros-users please use the unsubscribe link below. If you use the one above, you will stop all of ros-users from receiving updates.
______________________________________________________________________________
ros-users mailing list
ros-users@lists.ros.org
http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
Unsubscribe: <
http://lists.ros.org/mailman//options/ros-users>
(text/plain)